- From: Bernd Porr <bp1_at_cn.stir.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 08:25:59 +0100 (BST)
Comedi over a network is the right direction. Personally I would like to have some PHP-functions which access comedi so that I can have look at data coming from physical devices and directly generate a web-page. Here in Bochum they would need such a thing for remote monitoring of patient data. I also would welcome an XML interface which goes in the same direction. A standard API for web-based applications. Re USB: it works pretty well. The ECG practical here is now powered by a USB DAQ device which comedi. USB2.0 seems to be no problem. I'm just working on that. /Bernd On Sun, 11 May 2003, Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > We have had a meeting with a dozen or so free software projects > working in "control" (www.linuxincontrol.org), and spent a discussion > on Comedi. The result are these few questions: > > - is it possible/easy with the current API to do the following: > acquire data from different devices, with a common time stamp, and > within one single command specification? > > - what is the feeling towards "networked" data acquisition? That is, > would it make sense to define low-level drivers for USB, CAN, ... > and add the Comedi acquisition functions on top of these? > (USB implementation seems to be going on anyway :-) > > - some people (including myself) are interested in wrapping Comedi > into an XML and/or CORBA interface, in order to be able to embed the > acquisition into other control applications. Any comments on this? > > Herman > -- > K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Research Group > <http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~bruyninc> Tel: +32 16 322480 > > > _______________________________________________ > comedi mailing list > comedi_at_comedi.org > https://cvs.comedi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comedi > http://www.cn.stir.ac.uk/~bp1 mailto:bp1_at_cn.stir.ac.uk
Received on 2003-05-15Z06:25:59